Scott-King's concluding comment that his commitment to the classics is "the most long-sighted view it is possible to take" is intended as a serious perspective. The reader is meant to infer from this short work that the modern world is unmistakably disordered, that "progress" is actually devolution, and that the modern word is quite likely to dash itself against the rocks in the future. Thus, it is a purposeless effort to come to terms with it, much less to prepare oneself to "fit" within it. Scott-King is a conservative, that is, a person who refuses to believe that the unending quest for progress is movement in the right direction. In fact, that unexamined and unprincipled progress is quite likely the path to cultural insanity. It is Scott-King's perspective that a classical education provides the prophylactic to insanity, and affords an opportunity to cling to the few remaining moral principles in the chaos that is shortly to come. Evelyn Waugh's, Scott-King's Modern Europe, which I mention here, is a very short book, written in an entirely light tone. But, it manifests a clear intention.



